Lieutenant Samuel Kamalesan was recently in the news, as his petition against his dismissal from the army was rejected by the Supreme Court. Being a veteran, we have attended countless services in the temples, gurudwaras, churches and mosques over the four odd decades, while one was in the service of the nation. Frankly as a youngster in the unit, all these religious parades, as they were referred to, was not something one looked forward to eagerly, barring the gurudwara, where the attraction was the ‘kadha prasad’, (the mouthwatering ghee dripping ‘halwa’), and sure enough some of us would even volunteer to help in the distribution as at the end, there was a chance that we would be rewarded with an extra helping. Fresh out of the academies, most of us had just about bid farewell to the teenage, still adolescents at heart and many of our immature actions left our seniors in no doubt about that. While sports fields were fun, the religious worship routines were not, especially if it went on for too long, as the priest/granthi /maulvi invariably made it a point to instil all the scriptures laden sermons onto the gathering.
Many an articles have been written about the true secular values of the Indian Armed Forces,
where mutual tolerance is not just for display, but actually practised. The Muslim Commanding
Officer performing ‘aaratis’ in the unit temple, or the Hindu Commanding Officer observing ‘roza’
with their muslim troops, no wonder the expectation from each officer was that they would follow this healthy tradition religiously, which almost all of us did voluntarily, some may have followed the diktats
grudgingly, but none ever refused to toe the line. Perceptions matter, the troops must be
convinced that we are with them in thick and thin.
Let us understand the nuances of secularism, then I think we will be better placed to
comprehend this seemingly harsh action in its correct perspective. I feel as a nation, we
haven’t really assimilated the true essence of being ‘secular’. The Western definition is,
‘separation of the state from the church’, i.e. the state should not be a theocracy. Merely
absence of a singular religion as the official formal religion of the state may qualify strictly as
per the definition, but in India ours is a deeply religious society which is also a multi religious
one, we defined secularism as ‘tolerance’ for the other religions. The term ‘tolerance’, has a
negative connotation, i.e. we may or may not approve of the other’s faith, but are forced to live
with it, in other words, we simply tolerate it. Hinduism professes, ‘ekam sat vipra bahudha
vadanti’, meaning the truth is one, the wise express it differently, thus accepting everyone’s
version, not merely tolerating it. The moment, we start accepting this as a fact, there is no
dichotomy in our minds. By observing the regimental traditions, we are honouring the unit and
the men both. There is never an embargo on anyone following his personal religious beliefs in
his/her own time, i.e. individually one can go to the church or mosque, observe fasts or follow
any other practises which are mandated by their religion. Collectively, we take pride in
following the unit traditions, which may or may not be religious, it is here that friend Samuel
committed this blunder. The act of refusal of a lawful command is a punishable offence and this
was not by omission, it was by commission, hence it could not have been ignored.
Unfortunately, the usual suspects in the civil world, who are troubled by the decision, and are
raising the bogey of majoritarianism, are barking up the wrong tree. As there are countless
number of cases where, non Muslim officers have been observing roza voluntarily in solidarity
with the troops, as mentioned earlier. The true religion of a soldier is the “naam namak nishan”
, the ‘izzat’ of the unit, this is not understood by many in the civil world. Religion of the officer
is that of his unit. My earnest request is, let the armed forces be, please leave them alone and
please do not vitiate the environment in the units by unnecessarily looking for controversies.
The recent events in Bangladesh are not just a cause for concern but I think, it is now bordering as a threat in being. Ironically within a century, the lighthouse of Indian civilisation, undivided Bengal has turned into such a morass that no one could have imagined. It is difficult to imagine that this was the land of Tagore and Kazi Nazrul Islam, which even the British had to finally surrender to, when they revoked the 1905 division of Bengal. This abyss that both Bengals find themselves in today, can be traced back to the seeds of radicalisation sowed in the pre-partition era. The riots and violence which was unleashed on the minorities in the predominantly Muslim East Bengal those days was not an aberration. The overt bon-homie between the communities could not paper over the deep divide within, like a powder keg, just waiting for any trigger to explode. Humanity itself was disgraced and ashamed by the horrendous acts of mindless violence that arsonists indulged in...
Cockroaches are in news, they are gloating in their celebrity status, after all no less than the Chief Justice of India has compared them to the youth of our country, later clarified as fake degree holder unemployed ones. As though ‘rose by any other name wouldn’t smell as sweet’, so cockroach by any distinction will cease to be what the species is. Youth of our great nation are our hope for the future, they are the ‘dividend’ portion of the demographic equity that we the people have so painstakingly accumulated, generated and reproduced over the last nearly eight odd decades. Now comparison with cockroaches can be perceived as a compliment as we all are aware, their main characteristic is ‘survival’. They predate even dinosaurs, and will survive the nuclear holocaust too, God forbid but should that ever be perpetuated on us by some maniacs. Cockroaches have another very useful trait, the feminine gender of homo sapiens is by and large mighty scared of them. Males of the homo sap...
“Thucydide’s trap” was bandied about during the recent summit between Xi and Trump. The mere mention of a trap sent the advisors scurrying for cover, as none of them had ever heard of such a term. They were only aware of the ‘honeytrap’ especially of the Epstein variety. Google or may be even Chatgpt would have come to their rescue and they would have realised this was a lesson from ancient Greek history and related to the contest between the challenger to the throne and the incumbent power in the world order. I read about this sometime in the last decade while studying US-China relations and how and when would this phenomenon be applicable in the emerging global geopolitical scenario. The trap essentially describes that a conflict is bound to ensue with the rise of a new power, as was witnessed between Athens and Sparta about two millennia ago, after their victory over Persia. Be that as it may, Xi Jin Ping trumped hapless Trump with such unpronounceable tongue twisters wi...
Comments
Post a Comment